Carter and Carter Solicitors needs two pieces of evidence to value most nut allergy compensation claims: medical records proving the reaction, and proof of where you ate. Most people who contact the firm believe they lack what they need. After 19 years of allergy claim work across England and Wales, three out of four turn out to have more than they think. The complete nut allergy claims solicitors guide covers liability, valuation, and timelines in full.
We act nationwide: Based in Whaley Bridge on the edge of the Peak District, Carter and Carter Solicitors handles nut allergy claims across England and Wales. Everything is handled remotely by phone, video call, or email. You never need to travel anywhere. If the injury is severe and you would prefer to meet face-to-face, we can arrange a home visit. Call 0800 652 0586 to discuss your claim from wherever you are.
Nut allergy compensation evidence, what you need to know:
- Carter and Carter Solicitors needs medical records and proof of where you ate as the foundation of every claim
- England and Wales claimants have three years from the reaction date to issue proceedings
- Carter and Carter Solicitors values most nut allergy claims between £1,500 and £3,500
- CCTV footage is overwritten in 7 to 30 days under most retention policies
- Documented psychological impact frequently increases claim value above £2,000
|
Carter and Carter Solicitors knows which evidence insurers actually fear |
See Why → |
What evidence do I need for a nut allergy compensation claim?
Carter and Carter Solicitors needs two pieces of evidence as the foundation of every nut allergy compensation claim: medical records proving the reaction, and proof of where you ate. Medical records can be A&E attendance notes, GP consultation records, ambulance call logs, or pharmacy receipts for antihistamines. Proof of where you ate can be a till receipt, bank statement, booking confirmation, or delivery app order history. Both elements together establish the foundation. Photographs of visible symptoms, original packaging with allergen information, and witness statements strengthen the claim further.
The civil standard is balance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt. That means sufficient evidence rather than perfect evidence is required. Carter and Carter Solicitors has handled allergy claims since 2007 and has won files where packaging was discarded, hospital was not attended, or witnesses were unavailable. The dedicated nut allergy claims solicitors guide covers liability and timelines in full.
The legal framework: England and Wales only
Food businesses owe a duty of care under the Food Safety Act 1990 and the Food Information Regulations 2014. What this means for nut allergy claims specifically: when a customer informs the business of a nut allergy, the duty intensifies and the business must ensure the food served is safe. What this means for the reader right now: if you warned them about your allergy and they served you food containing nuts, the breach of duty is documented every time you reference your warning in evidence.
Each piece of evidence connects to a specific legal requirement. Medical records prove harm. A booking email mentioning “severe peanut allergy” proves you gave fair warning. The undeclared allergen proves the breach. Witness statements close the loop. Carter and Carter Solicitors gathers each piece methodically rather than randomly.
Why does the evidence I gather actually matter?
Evidence proves four specific elements: duty, breach, causation, and damage. Carter and Carter Solicitors uses medical records to prove damage, the booking email or staff conversation to prove the warning was given, the undeclared allergen to prove the breach, and witness statements to tie causation together. Miss one element and the legal claim collapses regardless of how serious the reaction was.
Insurers know most claimants give up when challenged. They question medical records. They claim the warning was unclear. They suggest you ate nuts elsewhere. After 19 years of allergy claim work, Carter and Carter Solicitors recognises every tactic: the training records that suddenly appear showing staff were “fully trained”, the witness statements from staff who “do not remember” you mentioning allergies, the attempt to blame you for not checking thoroughly enough. Strong evidence shuts these tactics down. The dedicated nut allergy claims where the business denies the warning was given guide explains how each is countered.
Why the timing of evidence preservation matters
Evidence degrades quickly. CCTV systems typically retain footage for 7 to 30 days before automatic deletion under most commercial retention policies. What this means for nut allergy claims specifically: the camera that recorded you speaking to the waiter about your allergy will be gone within a month. What this means for the reader right now: if your reaction was more than 30 days ago and you have not yet contacted a solicitor, CCTV is almost certainly lost and your claim now rests on documentary evidence and witnesses.
You have three years from the date of your reaction to issue proceedings under the Limitation Act 1980, but waiting is not the same as being safe. Wondering if it is too late to claim for a reaction years ago? Not necessarily. Discretion exists. The strongest claims are those where evidence was preserved immediately.
Evidence decay timeline: what disappears when
| Timeframe | What disappears | Impact on your claim |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1 to 7 | Menu changes, packaging discarded, digital menus updated | CRITICAL: Cannot prove what warnings were displayed |
| Weeks 2 to 4 | Staff memories degrade significantly | STRONG: Witness accounts become unreliable |
| Months 2 to 3 | Witnesses become untraceable as staff leave and customers move | STRONG: Cannot corroborate your account |
| Year 2 to 3 | Businesses change hands, records lost, time limit approaching | STRONG: Defendants less willing to settle |
| Bottom line: the sooner you act, the stronger your claim. Contact Carter and Carter Solicitors while evidence still exists. | ||
Evidence timeline: critical numbers
Not sure what evidence you have?
Discuss your situation with Carter and Carter Solicitors. No pressure, just honest advice about whether you can claim.
Call 0800 652 0586 or start your claim online.
Which evidence is critical and which is just helpful?
Carter and Carter Solicitors classifies evidence into three tiers: critical, strong, and bonus. Critical evidence is medical records proving the reaction and proof you ate at the establishment. Without these two elements the claim struggles. Strong evidence is original packaging with allergen information, clear allergy disclosure such as a booking email mentioning the allergy, and witness statements from people who heard the warning. Bonus evidence is photographs of the reaction, complaint correspondence, and contemporaneous social media posts.
The hierarchy matters because insurers attack each tier differently. Critical evidence gaps are claim-killers. Strong evidence gaps slow settlement and reduce value. Bonus evidence gaps barely register. After 19 years of allergy claim work, Carter and Carter Solicitors knows that imperfect evidence often proves perfectly adequate. The dedicated nut allergy claims where you did not attend hospital guide explains how lower-tier evidence carries claims when the critical tier is incomplete.
🔴 Critical evidence: medical records proving the reaction. A&E attendance notes. GP consultation records. Ambulance call logs. Pharmacy receipts for antihistamines. Even an EpiPen prescription from weeks earlier matters. It proves you are genuinely allergic, not claiming it now.
🔴 Critical evidence: proof you ate at their establishment. Receipt, booking confirmation, bank statement, or delivery app order. Something dated that places you there. Without this, the claim struggles, although in some cases oral evidence alone has proved sufficient. The insurer may suggest you ate nuts somewhere else that day. It sounds ridiculous. They try it anyway.
🟡 Strong evidence: original packaging with allergen information. Batch codes allow Carter and Carter Solicitors to trace exact suppliers, check ingredient specifications, and identify previous contamination incidents. Even packaging showing “may contain nuts” becomes powerful when you specifically asked for nut-free.
🟡 Strong evidence: clear allergy disclosure. Booking emails mentioning your allergy. Text messages to friends beforehand. Social media posts before the meal. Contemporaneous records carry enormous weight. Insurers struggle to dismiss evidence created before anything went wrong.
🟡 Strong evidence: witness statements from people who heard the warning. The dining companion who heard you tell the waiter. The friend you called immediately after reacting. Even other customers who overheard the conversation. Witnesses matter most when they heard you disclose the allergy. They prove you did your part.
🟢 Bonus evidence: photographs of the reaction. Swelling, rash, hives, timestamped photos help. Carter and Carter Solicitors has won plenty of claims without them. Most people having an allergic reaction are not thinking “better photograph this”. Courts understand that.
🟢 Bonus evidence: complaint correspondence. Your email to the restaurant. Their response or lack of one. Environmental health complaints. Shows you took it seriously. Not having complained does not stop you claiming. The guide on nut allergy claims where the business denies the warning was given covers the exact tactics used and how they are defeated.
🟢 Bonus evidence: social media posts. An angry Facebook post the next day is better evidence than you would think. Timestamped, public, contemporaneous. Hard for insurers to dismiss as fabricated later.
Not sure which evidence applies to your situation? Different allergy types require different evidence approaches. The complete allergy claims guide covers dairy, gluten, shellfish, and other food allergies, with specific evidence requirements for each.
“After 19 years handling nut allergy claims, Carter and Carter Solicitors knows which evidence insurers actually fear. It is not always what you would expect.”
Chris Carter, Managing Solicitor, Carter and Carter Solicitors
Evidence checklist: what you need and what to do if missing
| Evidence type | Priority | Why it matters | If you do not have it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical records | 🔴 CRITICAL | Proves reaction happened and severity | Carter and Carter Solicitors obtains GP and A&E records on your behalf |
| Proof you ate there | 🔴 CRITICAL | Proves causation linking the reaction to that meal | Bank statement, delivery app history; the firm investigates |
| Original packaging | 🟡 STRONG | Shows allergen breach; batch codes trace suppliers | Menu photos and authority prosecution records work |
| Allergy disclosure proof | 🟡 STRONG | Proves you warned them via booking emails or texts | Witness statements and Subject Access Requests |
| Witness statements | 🟡 STRONG | Corroborates your account; heard the warning | Medical and contemporaneous evidence often sufficient |
| Photos of reaction | 🟢 BONUS | Visual evidence of timestamped symptoms | Medical descriptions usually sufficient |
| Complaint emails | 🟢 BONUS | Shows contemporaneous concern | Not having complained does not hurt your claim |
| Social media posts | 🟢 BONUS | Timestamped record of immediate reaction | Helpful but not essential to success |
What medical records do I need to prove a nut allergy reaction?
Hospital records are the gold standard, but Carter and Carter Solicitors has won claims on GP records and pharmacy receipts alone. A&E attendance documents the timing, symptoms, treatment, and severity. The triage notes recording “patient reports restaurant peanut exposure” prove causation. The prescription for antihistamines or steroids proves you genuinely reacted. The discharge letter quantifies severity. Hospital records are hard for insurers to challenge.
If you self-treated at home, the path is harder but not impossible. A GP visit the next day showing symptoms creates the foundation. Pharmacy receipts for antihistamines purchased after the reaction help. Even an EpiPen prescription from weeks earlier matters because it proves you are genuinely allergic. Carter and Carter Solicitors handles medical records requests on every claim, knowing exactly what to ask GPs, hospitals, and ambulance services for. Most arrive within 28 days. The dedicated nut allergy claims where you did not attend hospital guide explains the alternatives in detail.
Carter and Carter Solicitors has won claims where clients self-medicated at home. In one case, the claimant knew from past experience the reaction was not life-threatening and stayed home while symptoms settled. The firm proved the allergy through medical history, demonstrated the restaurant got it wrong through menu analysis, and the claimant had complained to staff before leaving. The insurers accepted liability. Hospital attendance strengthens cases significantly, but immediate complaint plus other evidence can still win.
Not sure what evidence you have?
Three out of four people who contact Carter and Carter Solicitors say “I do not have enough evidence.” Two out of those three are wrong.
Free assessment, no obligation, honest advice
How do I prove I ate at the establishment that caused my reaction?
Carter and Carter Solicitors uses receipts, bank statements, booking confirmations, and delivery app records to prove you ate at the establishment. A receipt proves three elements at once: you were there, you ate on that date, and you ordered that specific dish. A bank statement confirms the transaction even when the receipt is lost. A booking confirmation places you in the restaurant on the date in question. Delivery app order histories from Deliveroo, Uber Eats, or Just Eat record what you ordered, when, and any special instructions such as “no nuts, severe allergy” in the notes section.
Digital payment trails are particularly powerful. Contactless payment, app-based ordering, and online booking with pre-payment are all timestamped and impossible to fabricate. Where direct proof is missing, the firm investigates through restaurant records, payment processor data, and witness statements. The broader guide to restaurant allergy claims (all allergens) covers the specific evidence pathway for restaurant-caused reactions.
Why packaging matters and what to do if it is gone
The container you nearly threw away is potentially valuable. Batch codes trace back to suppliers. Ingredient lists show what should have been declared. “May contain” warnings prove knowledge of contamination risk. Even the absence of warnings matters. Trading Standards prosecutions have been won on missing allergen labels alone.
Where packaging is lost, alternatives emerge. When restaurants have been prosecuted by local authorities for the same dish previously, those prosecution records become your evidence. Previous incident reports demonstrate a pattern of poor allergen management. Carter and Carter Solicitors has secured settlements without original packaging by proving the restaurant had form.
What if you really do not have packaging or receipts?
Carter and Carter Solicitors has won without. Menu photographs help by proving what was available and how allergens were labelled. Booking confirmations help by proving you were expected, sometimes with dietary requirements noted. Bank statements help by proving the transaction even without an itemised receipt.
It is harder. Investigating rather than proving takes longer and requires more work. Sometimes it fails. The firm tells you straight during your free assessment whether the evidence gaps are surmountable. If they are not, that is what you hear. Carter and Carter Solicitors does not take claims it does not believe in.
What happens with strong evidence vs weak evidence
| Scenario | ✓ With strong evidence | ✗ Without evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Insurer response | Quick settlement offer within weeks | Denial, delays, low-ball offers |
| Settlement value | Full compensation (£1,500 to £3,500) | Severely reduced or zero |
| Time to settle | 2 to 4 months typical | 12 months or more, higher risk of failure |
| Court risk | Rarely needed, around 1% of claims | Specialist nut allergy solicitors required |
Worried about missing evidence?
Carter and Carter Solicitors has built strong claims with less than you might think. Let the firm review what you have, honestly and without pressure.
Call Chris Carter on 01663 761891 for a free evidence assessment.
What records can my solicitor obtain from the restaurant?
Carter and Carter Solicitors obtains booking records, allergen training logs, incident reports, supplier specifications, and CCTV footage from the restaurant under formal legal disclosure. A Subject Access Request under GDPR 2018 entitles you to any data the business holds about you, including booking notes, order records, complaint correspondence, and internal staff messages discussing your reaction. The business must respond within one month. Allergen matrices are mandatory records showing which dishes contain which allergens. Staff training records prove or disprove the “fully trained” defence. Local authority inspection reports from Environmental Health and Trading Standards are public documents.
CCTV footage is the most time-sensitive record. Most commercial systems retain footage for 7 to 30 days before automatic deletion. The firm sends a CCTV preservation letter immediately upon instruction, and most businesses comply. Some “accidentally” delete it anyway, which tells its own story to a judge. The dedicated nut allergy injury compensation claims guide explains the disclosure process step by step.
Subject Access Requests under GDPR 2018
The restaurant holds records about you and the law requires them to provide them. Subject Access Requests under GDPR 2018 give you the right to see any data they hold relating to you. Free of charge. Within one month.
What Carter and Carter Solicitors can request: your booking details including any allergy notes, order records, complaint correspondence, staff incident reports mentioning you, CCTV footage if it still exists, payment records, and any internal communications about your reaction. The business must provide everything they hold about you, including emails between managers discussing “that allergic reaction yesterday”.
Allergen training records and supplier specifications
Restaurants must keep allergen matrices showing which dishes contain which allergens. They must document staff training on allergen management. They must retain supplier specifications proving ingredient content. All of this becomes evidence.
A common defence runs: staff were “fully trained” and “you never mentioned allergies”. Their own training records show the last allergen training was 18 months ago and should have been refreshed. Their incident log shows three previous nut allergy reactions in the past year. Suddenly the credibility evaporates.
Environmental Health and Trading Standards reports
Local authorities inspect food businesses regularly. Those inspection reports are public records. Carter and Carter Solicitors obtains them as standard. Food hygiene ratings, improvement notices, and previous warnings about allergen management are all documented.
If the restaurant has been prosecuted previously for allergen breaches, the prosecution records strengthen your claim significantly. Pattern of negligence. Established poor practice. Knowledge of the risk. Courts take this seriously.
CCTV footage: the 7 to 30 day window
Most commercial CCTV systems retain footage for 7 to 30 days before automatic deletion. After that, the footage is gone. This is why immediate action matters so much.
CCTV can prove: you were there, you spoke to staff, your visible reaction such as facial swelling and distress, the food you received, and critically whether the warning sign the business claims existed was actually visible. Where appropriate, Carter and Carter Solicitors requests CCTV preservation immediately upon instruction.
What should I do immediately after a nut allergy reaction?
Five clear actions matter most after a nut allergy reaction caused by restaurant or retailer negligence. Carter and Carter Solicitors has handled allergy claims across England and Wales since 2007 and has seen evidence disappear within weeks when these steps are not taken promptly. CCTV footage is overwritten after 30 days under most retention policies. Staff move on or change shifts. Receipts get lost. The five steps below compress 19 years of allergy claim work into the actions that matter most in the first 72 hours.
Five steps to take after a nut allergy reaction
- Seek immediate medical attention. Attend A&E or call 999 if the reaction is severe. Where antihistamines manage symptoms, see a GP within 48 hours so the reaction is recorded contemporaneously in your medical records. Medical records are the foundation of any compensation claim.
- Preserve the receipt and packaging. Keep the till receipt, bank statement, booking confirmation, and any food packaging or menu showing the dish ordered. Photograph everything before it is lost. Refrigerate any food samples in a sealed container.
- Photograph the symptoms. Document visible reactions such as swelling, rash, hives, and any urticaria. Make sure timestamps are visible. Memory and physical symptoms fade. Photographs do not.
- Document the conversation in writing. Write down who you told about the allergy, what you said, what staff replied, and the names of any witnesses. Email or text someone immediately describing what happened to create a timestamped record.
- Contact a specialist nut allergy claims solicitor. Time limits run from the date of the reaction. Carter and Carter Solicitors offers a no-cost first call on 0800 652 0586. The firm sends a CCTV preservation letter immediately to stop the footage being deleted.
A note on the figures used on this page
The 7 to 30 day CCTV retention range reflects standard commercial security system policies under GDPR data minimisation principles. What this means for nut allergy claims specifically: the camera that recorded you speaking to the waiter is gone within four weeks at the latest. What this means for the reader right now: if your reaction was last week, CCTV is still recoverable; if it was last month, it has almost certainly been overwritten and your claim now rests on documentary and witness evidence.
The 28-day medical records turnaround reflects NHS Subject Access Request response targets. The £1,500 to £3,500 typical bracket reflects the Judicial College Guidelines 17th Edition (April 2024) for non-traumatic injury and minor psychological injury, applied to typical nut allergy reactions where physical recovery completes within weeks.
Why choose Carter and Carter Solicitors for a nut allergy claim?
After 19 years handling nut allergy claims, Carter and Carter Solicitors has learned something most firms miss. Evidence gathering is not about checklists. It is about knowing which evidence actually matters to insurers. That expertise does not come from a training manual. It comes from doing this hundreds of times.
Deliberately small. Carter and Carter Solicitors could expand. Hire juniors. Build a call centre. We choose not to.
When you call with questions about your evidence, you get your solicitor’s direct mobile. Not 30 minutes on hold listening to how important your call is.
|
👥
2
Senior solicitors
Chris Carter (Managing Solicitor, qualified 1993) or David Healey (Senior Solicitor, qualified 2005) handles your claim personally. No twenty paralegals shuffling files.
|
🎯
Evidence specialists
Carter and Carter Solicitors knows which CCTV angles matter. Which Subject Access Requests work. Which medical records insurers actually fear.
|
|
⏱️
19
Years since 2007
Carter and Carter Solicitors has handled nut allergy claims since most firms were still Googling “Natasha’s Law”. The head start means knowing what works before you ask.
|
⭐
250
Five-star reviews
Real clients. Real outcomes. Not curated testimonials. Read every single review and see what people say about the evidence work.
|
The difference when evidence matters
| When you need help | ✓ Carter and Carter | ✗ Generic firms |
|---|---|---|
| CCTV about to delete? | Letters of claim sent urgently. The firm knows the 7 to 30 day window matters. | “We will get to that next week” (too late, it is gone) |
| Medical records unclear? | The firm knows which GP notes, pharmacy records, and A&E details prove severity, and obtains them on your behalf | “Just get us your hospital records” (leaves you to navigate NHS bureaucracy alone) |
| Restaurant claims ignorance? | The firm requests training logs, previous incidents, and FSA inspection reports that expose patterns | “It is your word against theirs” |
| Who handles your claim? | The same solicitor (Chris or David), start to finish. Direct mobile from day one. | Passed between departments, different faces at each stage |
| Urgent evidence questions? | Direct mobile to your solicitor during working hours. Chris or David answers, not reception. | Call centre closes at 5:30pm, voicemail until morning |
|
99%
Don’t proceed to a final court hearing
|
2007
No Win No Fee since
|
100%
Personal service
|
When insurers challenge your evidence (and they will), you are not explaining yourself to someone reading from a script. You are talking to the solicitor who knows your case inside out, because they have handled it from day one.
Five-star Google reviews
250 real clients, real results. See why people trust Carter and Carter Solicitors with their nut allergy claims.
Why your evidence succeeds with Carter and Carter Solicitors
|
Most solicitors collect evidence hoping something will stick. After 19 years of allergy claim work, Carter and Carter Solicitors knows exactly which three pieces of evidence insurers actually respect: medical records proving the reaction, proof you ate there, and the notification that you warned them. The crucial difference: when your evidence is imperfect, the firm knows which gaps matter and which do not. When packaging was thrown away, medical records carry the claim. When restaurants deny your allergy warning, the case is built regardless. Just two senior solicitors. Every claim handled personally. When insurers challenge your evidence, you are talking to the solicitor who has known your claim from day one. |
What makes evidence win
|
Let Carter and Carter Solicitors handle the investigation
The firm knows exactly what records exist, where they are held, and how to obtain them. You have been through enough. Let the firm do the heavy lifting.
Call 0800 652 0586 or start your claim online.
Bottom line: can you claim with imperfect evidence?
Yes. Medical records proving the reaction plus proof you ate at the establishment equals a valid claim foundation. Menu photos, witnesses, and documented allergy disclosure strengthen the case but are not always essential.
Act fast: menus change within days, CCTV deletes within 7 to 30 days, staff memories fade within weeks. Most people who contact Carter and Carter Solicitors believe they lack sufficient evidence. After 19 years of allergy claim work, the firm knows they are often wrong.
People also ask about nut allergy evidence
What if I threw away the food packaging after my reaction?
How long do I have to gather evidence for a nut allergy claim?
Can I claim if I didn’t go to hospital after my allergic reaction?
What evidence do I need to prove the restaurant knew about my allergy?
Frequently asked questions about nut allergy evidence
Will gathering evidence for my claim cost me anything?
What if the restaurant claims I never told them about my nut allergy?
How much compensation could I receive for a nut allergy reaction?
How long will it take to gather all the evidence I need?
Can I claim if the restaurant says they have no record of me eating there?
Do I have to come to your office in Derbyshire?
What if multiple pieces of evidence are missing, can I still claim?
How do you obtain business records that restaurants don’t want to provide?
Why do you handle evidence gathering instead of me doing it myself?
What makes Carter and Carter different when gathering evidence?
What if I contact you months after my reaction, is evidence still available?
- Medical records are critical, even GP notes the next day can carry your claim when other evidence is missing
- Evidence disappears fast, CCTV deletes within 7 to 30 days, making immediate action crucial
- Carter and Carter Solicitors obtains business records you cannot access, including training logs, previous incidents, and inspection reports through legal requests
- You likely have more evidence than you think, booking emails, texts, and bank statements all count as proof
Ready to review your evidence?
Chris Carter and David Healey personally handle every nut allergy claim. Your solicitor’s direct mobile from day one.
Need help now? Chris Carter and David Healey personally handle every nut allergy claim. Call Chris on 01663 761891 or David on 01663 761892 for honest advice about your evidence and whether you can claim.
Related nut allergy claim guides
Nut allergy claims solicitors
Complete overview of claiming compensation after allergic reactions.
Nut allergy compensation claims legal rights
Understanding Food Safety Act 1990 and Natasha’s Law protections.
How much compensation for a nut allergy reaction
Realistic settlement ranges based on 19 years of claims.
Nut allergy injury compensation claims timeline
Step-by-step guide from first call to settlement.
Claim compensation for a nut allergy reaction time limits
Three-year limitation periods and critical evidence deadlines.
Restaurant allergy claims (all allergens)
Separate guide covering allergic reactions at restaurants across dairy, gluten, shellfish, and other allergens beyond nuts.
Why your nut allergy claim succeeds with Carter and Carter Solicitors
After 19 years, the firm knows which three pieces of evidence turn “difficult claim” into “settled claim”. Most firms collect everything hoping something works. Carter and Carter Solicitors collects what matters and obtains what you are missing.
Do Carter and Carter Solicitors handle nut allergy claims nationwide?
Yes. Carter and Carter Solicitors is based in Whaley Bridge, Derbyshire, and acts for clients across England and Wales. Many clients come from Manchester, Liverpool, and Sheffield, but the firm gathers evidence wherever the reaction occurred.
Whether the reaction happened at a Manchester restaurant, a Liverpool supermarket, or anywhere else in England and Wales, Carter and Carter Solicitors has the expertise to gather evidence and pursue the claim.
Unlike larger firms where you would be passed between departments, Carter and Carter Solicitors is deliberately small. Two senior solicitors only. Chris Carter (Managing Solicitor, qualified 1993). David Healey (Senior Solicitor, qualified 2005). Your solicitor’s direct mobile from day one. No call centres, no juniors, no handoffs. Expert nut allergy evidence gathering from experienced solicitors who do things properly, wherever you are based.
Carter and Carter Solicitors attends Manchester County Court when needed, though 99% of claims do not proceed to a final court hearing.
Chris Carter
Managing Solicitor
👤 Personal Injury Specialist
📊 33 Years Experience
✅ Founder, Carter and Carter Solicitors
Chris Carter qualified as a solicitor in 1993 and founded Carter and Carter Solicitors in 2007. With 33 years in personal injury and 19 years building the firm’s allergy claim practice, he handles every nut allergy claim personally alongside David Healey. Direct senior-level handling, not junior handlers.
Direct line: 01663 761891
Email: chris@candcsolicitors.co.uk
“Carter & Carter solicitors were fantastic from the get go. Taking my nut allergy claim on straight away when other solicitors said that the case wasn’t worthy enough. I found them professional at all times and very forthcoming. I was always kept up to date with any further developments with the case either through text […]
Bianca Scott ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐