We Checked 100 Personal Injury Websites: Just Three Tell You Upfront What They Actually Charge

Home > Making a Claim > We Checked 100 Personal Injury Websites: Just Three Tell You Upfront What They Actually Charge
Rated Excellent · 250 Google Reviews · No Win No Fee · 0800 652 0586

By Chris Carter, Managing Solicitor · Published April 2026 · Last reviewed April 2026

 

Do Personal Injury Solicitors Publish Their Fees?

Key Findings

The most important findings from this study of 100 personal injury firms are:

  • Only 3 firms out of 100 publish a specific fee percentage below the legal maximum
  • 48 firms say “no win no fee” with no fee information of any kind
  • The SRA Transparency Rules (December 2018) specifically exempt personal injury
  • Carter and Carter charges 10% when claims settle without court proceedings
  • On a £10,000 claim, the difference between 10% and 25% is £1,500 of compensation

Do personal injury solicitors publish their fees? Carter and Carter Solicitors checked 100 no win no fee firms across England and Wales to find out. Only 3 publish a specific fee. 48 say “no win no fee” and nothing else. The other 49 promise to explain their fees but never put a number on their website. This is the first study of its kind.

The Results

Carter & Carter Original Research · April 2026

What 100 Personal Injury Firms Tell You About Their Fees

Pie chart showing that 97% of personal injury firms in England and Wales do not publish a specific fee - 48% say nothing at all, 35% promise to explain, 14% say up to 25%, and only 3% publish a fee

3
14
35
48

3 firms

Category A: Publish a specific fee below 25%

Three firms out of a hundred. That is 3%. These are the only firms in our study where a visitor can see exactly what the firm charges without making contact. The fee is on the website, in plain language, before anyone picks up the phone.

14 firms

Category B: State “up to 25%” or “capped at 25%”

They give you a ceiling. But a ceiling is not a price. “Up to 25%” could mean 10%. It could mean 25%. You will not find out which until after you have committed. The visitor learns the legal maximum, not what this firm actually charges.

35 firms

Category C: Promise to explain fees but publish no number

“We will discuss our fees with you.” “Your solicitor will explain costs at your initial consultation.” Words that sound like transparency but deliver nothing you can act on before you call. You know fees exist. You do not know what they are.

48 firms

Category D: Say “no win no fee” only. Nothing else.

Nearly half of all firms we checked. The phrase “no win no fee” and nothing else. No percentage. No explanation of what you pay when you win. A visitor reading only these websites would not know that a fee may be deducted from their compensation at all.

97%

of personal injury firms in England and Wales do not publish a specific fee below the legal maximum

What Happens If You Win a No Win No Fee Claim?

The most striking finding is Category D. 48 firms, nearly half the sample, use the phrase “no win no fee” without explaining that a percentage of the client’s compensation may be deducted when the claim succeeds. A person reading only those websites would have no idea what they might be charged. “No win no fee” answers the question “what happens if I lose?” It does not answer “what happens if I win?” And that is the question that matters to every person who makes a successful claim.

“Our research found that nearly half of all firms we checked use the phrase ‘no win no fee’ without ever explaining what you pay when you win. That is not transparency. That is a slogan.”

Chris Carter, Managing Solicitor, Carter & Carter Solicitors

What This Means for Your Compensation

Under LASPO 2012 (part of the Jackson reforms to civil litigation costs), the success fee on a personal injury claim can be up to 25% of your general damages (compensation for pain, suffering and loss of amenity, as valued using the Judicial College Guidelines) and past financial losses. It cannot be taken from future losses such as ongoing care costs or future earnings. The difference between fee levels is real money.

What you keep from your compensation at different fee levels

£10,000 claim at 10%

Fee: £1,000

You keep £9,000

£10,000 claim at 25%

Fee: £2,500

You keep £7,500

Difference

 

£1,500

£30,000 claim at 10%

Fee: £3,000

You keep £27,000

£30,000 claim at 25%

Fee: £7,500

You keep £22,500

Difference

 

£4,500

£50,000 claim at 10%

Fee: £5,000

You keep £45,000

£50,000 claim at 25%

Fee: £12,500

You keep £37,500

Difference

 

£7,500

Same claim. Same outcome. Same work. Different fee. Your money.

What Else We Found: Four Patterns Worth Knowing

Firms that publish fees for other services but not for personal injury

The SRA Transparency Rules (December 2018) require solicitors to publish pricing for conveyancing, probate, employment tribunals, immigration, motoring offences, and debt recovery. Personal injury is exempt. We found firms that list fixed fees for conveyancing and probate on dedicated pricing pages while their personal injury section, on the same website, contains no fee information at all. The gap is not an oversight. These firms are complying with the rules. The problem is what the rules do not cover.

Every Category B firm (those stating “up to 25%”) publishes the maximum, not a lower figure

All 14 Category B firms use the 25% legal maximum as their published figure. Not one publishes a number below 25%. The most common formulations are “up to 25%” and “capped at 25% of your general damages.” This means that even among the small group of firms that give you a number, the number is always the ceiling. A person comparing Category B firms would conclude that every firm charges the same. The published figure tells you the maximum the law allows. It does not tell you what that firm charges.

Category C firms (those that promise to explain) use the same language to say nothing

Across the 35 Category C firms, the same phrases appear repeatedly: “We will discuss our fees with you.” “Your solicitor will explain costs at your initial consultation.” “A percentage of your compensation will be deducted if your claim is successful.” Each of these acknowledges that a cost exists without quantifying it. The language is designed to reassure rather than inform. A person reading these pages learns that fees exist and that they will be explained later. They do not learn what the fees are.

A court ruled that automatic 25% fees are not always justified

In a 2023 Court of Appeal case, a personal injury firm’s practice of automatically charging the maximum 25% success fee without carrying out a risk assessment of the individual claim was found to be unjustified. The court reduced the fee. The ruling under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) suggests that the 25% maximum should reflect the actual risk of the case, not be applied as a default. Our research cannot determine what firms charge in practice. But when 97% do not publish and 100% of those who give a number give the maximum, the question of what is actually charged becomes impossible for the public to answer.

Why Are Personal Injury Fees Exempt from Transparency Rules?

The Solicitors Regulation Authority introduced its Transparency Rules in December 2018. Some types of legal work require published pricing. Personal injury does not.

Must publish fees

✓ Residential conveyancing

✓ Employment tribunals

✓ Immigration

✓ Debt recovery (up to £100k)

✓ Motoring offences

✓ Probate

No requirement

✗ Personal injury

No firm is required to publish any fee information. The 3 that do have chosen to voluntarily.

 

The SRA’s published reasoning acknowledged that personal injury fees are complex and vary by case. That is true. But the practical effect is that no personal injury firm in England and Wales is required to publish any fee information at all. The gap between what the SRA requires for conveyancing (where you can see the price before you instruct) and what it requires for personal injury (where you cannot) is a policy choice with real consequences for consumers.

 

Without a regulatory requirement, publishing is voluntary. And when publishing is voluntary in a market where silence removes the ability to compare, the incentive to publish is low. The 3 Category A firms (those that publish a specific fee) have chosen to compete on transparency. The 97 that do not have their own reasons. Neither group is breaking any rule.

The SRA’s own mission statement includes making sure that consumers can get the information they need to make informed choices. In personal injury, they cannot.

But Aren’t Personal Injury Fees Genuinely Complicated?

Yes. And this is the argument the industry relies on. Personal injury fees are not like conveyancing fees. The work involved in a claim where liability is admitted in the first letter and the claim settles in four months is very different from a claim where the employer denies responsibility, the evidence is disputed, and court proceedings run for two years. The risk to the solicitor is different. The work is different. The fee may reasonably be different.

 

We accept that. A single fixed fee for every claim may not always be realistic. But that is not what we are asking for. What we found is that 97% of firms do not explain anything at all.

What 97 out of 100 firms do not provide

A fee range

A list of factors that determine the fee

A worked example

Even a sentence explaining how fees are determined

 

 

The problem is not that firms cannot give a precise number for every claim. The problem is that they give nothing.

0

of the 97 firms that withhold their fee percentage offer a range, a worked example, or even a sentence explaining how fees are determined

What Does This Tell You About Which Firm to Choose?

A firm that puts its fee on its website before you call has made a choice to be upfront. A firm that doesn’t has made a different choice.

 

A firm that hides its fee until after you call is making a different choice. It may still be a good firm. It may still do good work. But it has decided that you do not need to know the price before you commit. And 97 out of 100 firms have made that same decision.

 

When you are choosing a solicitor to handle your personal injury claim, the fee is not the only thing that matters. But the willingness to publish it tells you something that no amount of marketing language can. It tells you whose interests come first.

 

We are one of the three firms in this study that publishes. Here is what we charge.

Our Fee Structure

10%

of your compensation when settled without court proceedings being issued

25%

only if court proceedings become necessary

Court proceedings are issued in a significant number of claims as a normal step in the process. Full fee details here.

Common Questions About This Research

Are solicitors legally required to publish their personal injury fees?
No. The SRA Transparency Rules (December 2018) require solicitors to publish pricing for conveyancing, probate, employment tribunals, immigration, debt recovery, and motoring offences. Personal injury is specifically exempt. No regulator requires any personal injury firm to publish its fee. The firms that publish do so by choice.
What does “up to 25%” actually mean?
It means the firm could charge you anything from 0% to 25% of your general damages and past losses. You will not know where you fall within that range until the firm tells you, which our research shows usually happens after you have made contact and begun the process of instructing them. “Up to 25%” is the legal maximum, not a specific price. Every Category B firm in our study uses this figure. Not one publishes a lower number.
Can I negotiate the success fee with my solicitor?
Yes. The success fee is part of the Conditional Fee Agreement between you and your solicitor. It is not fixed by law at 25%. That is the maximum, not the default. You are entitled to ask what percentage the firm charges and whether it can be reduced. If a firm refuses to discuss the fee before you sign, that tells you something about how they view the relationship.
What is the difference between the success fee and other costs?
The success fee is the percentage your solicitor is entitled to deduct from your compensation for their work on the claim. Most firms charge one, though the percentage varies. Other costs may include After the Event (ATE) insurance premiums, which cover you if the claim fails, and disbursements such as court fees or medical report fees. The total deduction from your compensation may be more than just the success fee. You should ask your solicitor to confirm the maximum total amount that could be deducted before you sign anything.
Has any court ruled on whether 25% is always justified?
Yes. In a 2023 Court of Appeal case, a personal injury firm’s practice of automatically charging the maximum 25% success fee without assessing the risk of the individual claim was found to be unjustified. The court reduced the fee. The ruling suggests that 25% should be reserved for higher-risk claims, not applied as a blanket default. The case was decided under the LASPO 2012 framework governing success fees in Conditional Fee Agreements.
If fees are complicated, why should firms publish them?
We are not arguing that every firm should publish a single fixed fee for every claim. We accept that personal injury work varies in complexity and risk. But there is a wide gap between “a single fixed fee” and “no information at all.” A firm could explain what factors determine the fee, give a typical range, or describe what happens at different stages of the claim. Our study found that 97 out of 100 firms do none of these things. The complexity of PI fees explains why a single number might be difficult. It does not explain why the public is given nothing.

How We Conducted This Study

We searched Google for “personal injury solicitors” and worked through the results in order. We checked each firm’s website to confirm it met our inclusion criteria. We continued until we had 100 qualifying firms based in England or Wales.

 

Included

Firms based in England or Wales offering personal injury claims as a core service, with a live website at the time of research (April 2026).

Excluded

Scottish firms (different legal system). Firms whose websites could not be reached. Firms not offering PI. Duplicate entries. Claims management companies (regulated by the Claims Management Regulator, not the SRA).

 

Where a firm was excluded after initial selection, it was replaced with the next qualifying firm from the search results. 13 firms were replaced during the study. The final sample includes firms from every region of England and Wales, ranging from large national practices to small specialist firms.

 

For each firm, we checked the homepage, the personal injury page, any “no win no fee” or “funding your claim” page, any dedicated fees or pricing page, and the FAQ section. We were looking for one thing: does this firm publish a specific fee percentage for personal injury claims on its website?

 

Methodology note: This study records what is published on firm websites as of April 2026. It does not record what firms actually charge in practice, which may differ from what is published or not published online. Firms may change their websites after the research date.

3 Out of 100 Firms Publish. We Are One of Them.

What This Means If You Choose Us

1

One senior solicitor, start to finish

Chris Carter (qualified 1993, 33 years) or David Healey (qualified 2005, 21 years). Not a junior. Not a call handler. Your solicitor knows your name and your claim.

10%

Published on our website before you call

10% when settled without court proceedings. 25% only if proceedings become necessary. Not revealed after you have committed.

3

Three claim types only

Accidents at work, allergy and anaphylaxis claims, and accidents in public places. Three things done properly rather than thirty done adequately.

250

Five-star Google reviews

Real clients across England and Wales. Not selected testimonials. Independent reviews you can read yourself.

Ready to talk to a firm that publishes its fees?

0800 652 0586

See our full fee structure

About This Research

This study was conducted by Carter & Carter Solicitors in April 2026. The research was carried out by Chris Carter, Managing Solicitor (qualified 1993, 33 years of personal injury practice).

 

We acknowledge that as a firm that publishes its fees, we have a perspective on this issue. We have presented the data without naming any firm and without characterising any firm’s decision not to publish as wrong. The data speaks for itself. Readers can draw their own conclusions.

Want to Talk to a Firm That Publishes Its Fees?

Call Chris or David directly. No call handlers. No scripts. Just an upfront conversation with a senior solicitor who will tell you what it costs before you commit to anything.

0800 652 0586

Free call · No obligation · Available Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm

Chris Carter is the Managing Solicitor at Carter & Carter Solicitors in Whaley Bridge, Derbyshire. Qualified in 1993, Chris has spent over 33 years handling personal injury claims across the firm’s three specialist practice areas: accidents at work, allergy and anaphylaxis claims, and accidents in public places. Carter & Carter is one of very few firms in England and Wales to publish its fee structure upfront and to handle every claim personally at senior solicitor level from start to finish.





Back
Next