Your Employer Saw the Danger on Camera and Still Did Nothing. Here’s What that Means for Your Claim.

Home > Your Employer Saw the Danger on Camera and Still Did Nothing. Here’s What that Means for Your Claim.post>

Your Employer Saw the Danger on Camera and Still Did Nothing. Here’s What that Means for Your Claim.


Established 2007 · ★★★★★ 250 Five-Star Google Reviews · No Win No Fee Since 2007 · Call Free: 0800 652 0586

By Chris Carter, Managing Solicitor · March 2026 · Accident at Work Claims

Quick Answer

My employer knew about the danger at work but only put up warning signs. Is that enough to protect them legally?

No. A warning sign or a sticker is not a safe system of work. Your employer has a legal duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 to physically prevent you from reaching a danger zone. If they knew about the risk and chose a sign over a guard, a barrier, or a proper procedure, they failed in that duty. You have the right to claim compensation.

A national building merchant was fined £2.2 million last week after a worker was crushed to death by a three-tonne pallet of timber on an industrial conveyor. He had climbed inside the machine to remove packaging. A colleague started the conveyor without seeing him.

The worker was killed instantly. He was 56 years old.

But here is the detail that matters most. The HSE investigation found CCTV footage showing that workers had entered the same danger zone 19 times in the five weeks before the fatal incident.

The company knew. They put up stickers asking people not to do it. Nothing else.

That is the gap between knowing about a risk and actually doing something about it. And it is exactly the kind of gap that gives rise to a workplace injury claim.

They Put Up a Sticker and Thought That Was Enough

The HSE prosecution made one thing very clear. The company knew workers were getting into the danger zone around the conveyor. They stuck warning labels on the machine. And they left it at that.

No physical guarding. No interlocks. No change to the system that required people to unwrap pallets inside the machine. Just a sticker.

After the worker died, the company installed guarding and changed the system so pallets were unwrapped before reaching the conveyor. Every one of those measures could have been in place before. The £2.2 million fine reflects that.

But My Employer Told Us About the Risk. Doesn’t That Let Them Off the Hook?

No. Under Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, your employer must provide a safe system of work so far as is reasonably practicable.

Telling you about a danger is one small part of that duty. It is not the whole thing.

A safe system of work means eliminating the risk where possible, or controlling it with physical barriers, interlocks, or guarding. If your employer can physically prevent you from reaching a moving machine part, they must.

The hierarchy of control runs in a specific order: eliminate, substitute, isolate, engineer, then administer. Signs and procedures sit near the bottom.

A sticker is an administrative control. When a company chooses that over guarding or isolation, they have skipped the entire top half of the hierarchy. That is a breach.

Something Most People Don’t Realise

CCTV footage does not just help the employer. If your employer’s own cameras show that a dangerous practice was happening repeatedly before your injury, that footage becomes the strongest piece of evidence in your claim. It proves they had a way to see the problem and chose not to act. If your workplace has CCTV and you have been injured, mention it to your solicitor immediately. That footage can be requested as part of the claims process.

I Got Hurt at Work and There Were Warning Signs Everywhere. Does That Mean I Can’t Claim?

This is a common fear. “There was a sign saying it was dangerous, so it must be my fault.” It is wrong.

A warning sign does not transfer the employer’s duty onto you. Your employer cannot outsource their legal obligation with a laminated notice. If a physical guard was reasonably practicable and they did not install it, the sign is irrelevant.

This does not mean your own actions play no part at all. If you deliberately ignored clear safety procedures that your employer had properly implemented, that could reduce your compensation through contributory negligence.

But “properly implemented” means much more than a poster on a wall. It means training, supervision, physical controls, and a genuine system that works in practice.

In this case, workers entered the danger zone 19 times in five weeks. If a system relies on people never making a mistake, the system is the failure. In 33 years of handling accident at work claims, this is a pattern we know well.

What the Law Actually Requires From Your Employer

Under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER), your employer must:

1. Carry out a risk assessment that identifies the specific dangers of each task and each piece of equipment.

2. Physically prevent access to dangerous parts of machinery through guards, interlocks, or barriers.

3. Review and update the system when they become aware it is not working. CCTV footage, near-miss reports, and accident book entries all count as awareness.

“If your employer’s CCTV shows people were doing something dangerous repeatedly, and the employer’s response was a sticker and nothing else, that is not a defence. That is evidence of a breach. The bigger the gap between what they knew and what they did about it, the stronger your claim.”

Chris Carter, Managing Solicitor · Carter & Carter Solicitors

What Should I Do If I’ve Been Hurt and My Employer Knew About the Risk?

If you have been injured at work and you believe your employer was already aware of the danger, here is what matters right now.

Write down everything you remember about the conditions before the accident. Was there a sign? Had other workers raised the issue? If your workplace has CCTV, note where the cameras are and tell your solicitor immediately.

Your employer is legally required to preserve CCTV footage, risk assessments, training records, and accident book entries once they know a claim is being considered. CCTV systems often record over old footage within 30 days, so act quickly. Read more about employer duty of care.

You have three years from the date of your injury to bring a claim under the Limitation Act 1980. But the sooner you act, the easier it is to secure evidence.

What Does It Cost to Make a Claim?

10%

of your compensation when your claim is settled without court proceedings. This is how roughly 99% of our claims are resolved.

25%

of your compensation only if court proceedings become necessary. Most personal injury firms charge 25% regardless. We do not.

No win, no fee. No hidden charges. Published upfront since 2007. See our full fee breakdown.

Related Guides

Your Employer Knew About the Risk. What Does That Mean for Your Claim?

Injured by a Machine at Work? Your Rights Explained

When Equipment Falls or a Vehicle Is Poorly Propped at Work

Was the Accident Partly My Fault? You Can Still Claim

Read What Our Clients Say About Working With Us

Why Work With Carter & Carter? Our Fees, Our Promise

Been Injured at Work? Let’s Talk.

If your employer knew about the risk and did not fix it properly, you have the right to claim. Call Chris or David directly for a free, honest conversation about where you stand. No pressure, no jargon, no cost.

0800 652 0586

Free from mobiles and landlines · Available Mon-Fri

About the Author

Chris Carter is the Managing Solicitor at Carter & Carter Solicitors, based in Whaley Bridge, Derbyshire. Qualified in 1993, Chris has over 33 years of experience in personal injury law, with a concentrated specialism in workplace accident claims. He has handled hundreds of claims involving machinery injuries, employer negligence, and unsafe systems of work, acting for clients across England and Wales.

Carter & Carter is a two-solicitor specialist firm handling four claim types only: accident at work claims, needlestick injuries, food allergy claims, and accidents in public places. Every claim is handled personally by Chris or his colleague David Healey (qualified 2005, 21 years’ experience). No juniors, no call handlers, no handoffs. Learn more about Carter & Carter.

Back
Next